What Is Vibe Coding — And Should Aspiring Programmers Try It?
Dr. Kai Dupe • June 1, 2025
Vibe coding refers to an intuitive, almost improvisational approach to writing code
In the world of software development, where structure, documentation, and best practices reign supreme, a new term has been floating around in developer circles: vibe coding. It’s not in the textbooks, and you won’t find it on a certification exam, but if you’ve ever written code just to “see what happens,” you’ve probably done it.
Vibe coding
refers to an intuitive, almost improvisational approach to writing code. Instead of spending hours planning architecture or writing detailed specs, a vibe coder jumps right in, guided by instinct, creativity, and flow. Think of it like freestyling in music — no roadmap, just rhythm, feeling, and the moment.
This approach can be incredibly powerful. For one, it fosters creativity and rapid prototyping. Vibe coding helps you get ideas out of your head and into code fast. It’s ideal for hackathons, passion projects, or exploring new libraries where the goal is experimentation rather than polish. It also helps developers build confidence by trusting their intuition and learning through doing.
But there are trade-offs. Vibe coding can lead to messy code, lack of documentation, and poor scalability. What feels right in the moment might break later under pressure. For teams, vibe coding without communication can cause confusion. And without tests or planning, refactoring becomes a nightmare. In short: it’s easy to accumulate technical debt
when you're coding purely by vibe.
So, should aspiring programmers embrace vibe coding?
Yes — with boundaries. Vibe coding is a valuable skill, especially when learning or prototyping. It allows beginners to explore code without fear and builds fluency. But it should be balanced with good engineering habits: test your code, document your work, and learn when structure matters.
Think of vibe coding as a mode — like switching from “plan” mode to “play” mode. It’s not a replacement for solid development practices, but a complement. When used intentionally, it can make you a more creative, confident, and adaptive programmer.
So vibe on — just don’t forget to clean up your code when the music stops.
A mentor gives you advice. A sponsor creates opportunities.
Representation alone will not solve the persistent racial disparities in computing.
The truth is that most software applications exist to manage information.
Artificial intelligence has become the newest member of nearly every software development team.
The true promise of computing is not found in the machines we build, but in the human potential we unlock when knowledge becomes accessible to everyone.
One of the reasons I value the MCT program so highly is that it represents more than technical knowledge.
Software engineering is not simply coding.
Companies often promote the idea that technical skill alone determines success.
Hackathons also strengthen teamwork and communication skills.
Stepping onto the campus of Morehouse College this past weekend for Admitted Students Day was more than a visit—it was a moment of reflection. As I watched young Black men walk with purpose across the yard, I found myself asking a simple but profound question: What would it have been like for me to study computer science here? My journey into computing was shaped in environments where I was often the only Black man in the room. That reality brings with it an unspoken weight—the need to prove you belong, the awareness of being watched, and sometimes, the quiet isolation that comes with underrepresentation. Standing at Morehouse, I realized that this burden is not a given. It is a condition of the environment. At Morehouse, the environment is different by design. Here, Black men are not anomalies—they are the standard. I imagined what it would feel like to learn algorithms, data structures, and software development in a space where my identity was not questioned but affirmed. Where excellence is expected, not in spite of who you are, but because of it. As a computer science professor, I understand the academic rigor required to succeed in this field. There is no shortcut through recursion, no bypass around debugging, no substitute for disciplined problem-solving. But what struck me during my visit is how much context matters. When students are free from the psychological burden of proving they belong, they can redirect that energy toward mastering the material. They can collaborate more openly, ask questions more freely, and take intellectual risks without fear. I also thought about legacy. At Morehouse, students walk the same grounds as Martin Luther King Jr.. That kind of history does something to a person. It raises the bar—not just academically, but personally. It invites students to see their education not just as a pathway to a career, but as preparation for impact. Leaving campus, I felt inspired—but also reflective. I cannot rewrite my journey, but I can appreciate what spaces like Morehouse offer the next generation. For a Black male pursuing computer science, it is more than a degree. It is an opportunity to develop skill, confidence, and identity in alignment. And that combination is powerful.